xjwsforChrist

Non-Religious Christian Spirituality
It is currently Sun Dec 07, 2025 12:49 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 327 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:44 pm
Posts: 1323
If I may, a simple search provided one, of many hits, if any are so inclined:

http://www.ignatianspirituality.com/ignatian-prayer/the-spiritual-exercises/prayer-is-a-conversation/

Quote:
Prayer Is a Conversation

The underlying dynamic of Ignatian prayer is that of a conversation. We are in a relationship with God that involves give and take, our response to his invitation, a sharing of life. The Spiritual Exercises urge us to see ourselves as God sees us—as sons and daughters, members of his family. Jesus used the affectionate word abba to refer to his Father when he prayed. The closest English equivalent is “Papa.” We can address God in the same intimate way because we are his children.

Prayer is a natural outcome of this close relationship. Prayer is a conversation. The essential activity of prayer springs naturally from our humanity. It is a matter of conversing with a very good friend.

More on Prayer as a Conversation by David L. Fleming, SJ
From What Is Ignatian Spirituality?

From the beginning of his spiritual journey, Ignatius had a good idea of what he wanted to do. He wanted to evangelize, to bring the good news of the Incarnation to others. He wanted to lead others into a relationship with Christ Jesus.

How to accomplish this was less clear. It took years for him to develop the attitudes, insights, and techniques that we know as Ignatian spirituality. He made many mistakes along the way and wandered down several blind alleys. He was familiar with the work of the Dominicans—an order of learned clerics who specialized in the ministry of preaching. Ignatius admired good preaching, but this was not the evangelistic tool he was looking for. Ignatius was attracted to the Franciscans, who gave a powerful witness to the gospel through their poverty. But he did not think that humble itinerant begging was the direction God wanted him to take.

Some spiritual approaches seemed too passive to him. They were based on reading books and listening to sermons and lectures. They appeared to say that God can be found through some kind of passive absorption of good will and good behavior. Ignatius practiced an active spirituality. He understood that people were actively engaged with work in the world. They had dealings with each other. They shared life with each other. This active sharing of grace and gifts and talents eventually became the how for his evangelistic ministry.

Ignatius describes his ministry by the simple Spanish word conversar. Conversar means “to converse,” “to talk with.” Its simplest meaning in English is sincere talk with another person, the kind of comfortable, satisfying conversation whereby we truly get to know someone else. Ignatius must have been a master of this kind of conversation. He seems to have had an extraordinary gift for friendship. The first Jesuits were a group of men who were initially bound together by their affection and love for Ignatius Loyola.

Conversar has broader meanings as well. It means “to be conversant with” something or someone—that is, to truly know them deeply. It means “to have dealings with.” To converse with someone is to know them and to be involved with their lives. In the Ignatian scheme of things, to converse is one of our ways of loving.

Ignatius’s spiritual life developed around the idea of conversation. It is based on conversation with God in prayer. It is developed through conversation with others—spiritual directors, confessors, like-minded friends who share one’s ideals and way of life. It is expressed in conversation as ministry—sharing the gospel with others. All three conversations are embodied in the Spiritual Exercises. The retreatant is guided through the exercises by conversation with a spiritual director who cultivates the conversation with God. The exercises nurture a conversation with God. The goal of the Exercises is to help the person get involved in a more fruitful conversation with others in ministry.

In fact, the Exercises themselves are the product of years of conversation. Ignatius developed them from his experience as a spiritual director of men and women seeking a deeper relationship with God. He would suggest ways to pray, scripture passages to meditate on, scenes to imagine, ideas to ponder. Then he and his friends would talk about what happened in prayer. Together they would discern how God seemed to be leading. Ignatius’s book, perhaps the most influential book ever written about developing our relationship with God, is essentially a collection of these exercises, sharpened and honed in conversation.

The Spiritual Exercises are structured around the developing relationship between the retreatant and Jesus Christ. They urge us to see ourselves as God sees us—as his sons and daughters, members of his family. Jesus used the affectionate word abba to refer to his Father when he prayed. The closest English equivalent is “Papa.” We can address God in the same intimate, friendly way because we are his children.

Prayer is a natural outcome of this close relationship. It is not something mysterious or esoteric or something that we learn how to do in school. Prayer is conversation. If we can talk, we can pray. Of course we can learn to pray better, just as we can learn to be better conversationalists. That, in fact, was Ignatius’s intention in putting together his Spiritual Exercises. But the essential activity of prayer springs naturally from our humanity. It is a matter of conversing with a very good friend.

Consider what Jesus did when the disciples asked him, “Lord, teach us to pray.” Did these good Jewish men, who prayed five times a day (at least), really mean that they did not know how to pray? Hardly. They wanted to know Jesus’ way of praying. So he taught them the Our Father, which is the template of all Christian prayer.

Jesus’ way of praying is more important than the words he taught us. We are personally familiar with God (“our Father”). We reverence him (“who art in heaven,” “hallowed be thy name”). We share God’s desires (“thy kingdom come,” “thy will be done”). We ask for what we need (“give us this day our daily bread”). We beg our Father’s protection (“deliver us from evil”).

These elements of prayer cover the whole range of human conversation: sharing experience, saying thank you, asking for help, crying out in pain, begging forgiveness, expressing love, just spending time together. This is what we do when we get together with our friends. We do the same thing when we get together with God. Prayer takes many forms: mystical prayer, devotional prayer, liturgical prayer, sacred reading, moments of epiphany snatched from our everyday lives. All of it is included in Ignatius’s conversar.

This is what is meant by the famous Ignatian motto “finding God in all things.” “All things” to Ignatius is the whole panoply of human drama—our relationships, our work, our strivings and failures, our hopes and dreams. God can be found in all of it. Found does not mean an intellectual exercise of perceiving the presence of the divine. It means engaging God in it, meeting him, dealing with him. It is matter of conversar—an intimate conversation and the interacting that takes place between family members who love each other.Excerpt from What Is Ignatian Spirituality? by David L. Fleming, SJ.

God Wants our Friendship by William Barry, SJ
It’s an amazing fact: we can approach God as friends.

_________________
Image "I am proud to say that I will not lift one finger ( except my middle finger) for the WTBTS."


Last edited by s-Kally on Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 2:11 pm
Posts: 866
Nice find, sKally, exactly what I'd have loved to find for myself if I'd only had the now se to Google appropriately!

Thanks! :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:19 am
Posts: 3402
Interesting article. It also is not speaking about... Christ talking BACK, though.


These were the two paragraphs that stood out to me:

Quote:
Ignatius’s spiritual life developed around the idea of conversation. It is based on conversation with God in prayer. It is developed through conversation with others—spiritual directors, confessors, like-minded friends who share one’s ideals and way of life. It is expressed in conversation as ministry—sharing the gospel with others. All three conversations are embodied in the Spiritual Exercises. The retreatant is guided through the exercises by conversation with a spiritual director who cultivates the conversation with God. The exercises nurture a conversation with God. The goal of the Exercises is to help the person get involved in a more fruitful conversation with others in ministry.

In fact, the Exercises themselves are the product of years of conversation. Ignatius developed them from his experience as a spiritual director of men and women seeking a deeper relationship with God. He would suggest ways to pray, scripture passages to meditate on, scenes to imagine, ideas to ponder. Then he and his friends would talk about what happened in prayer. Together they would discern how God seemed to be leading. Ignatius’s book, perhaps the most influential book ever written about developing our relationship with God, is essentially a collection of these exercises, sharpened and honed in conversation.



Please don't get me wrong, I am not knocking this above... but I don't see anything in the article regarding Christ speaking BACK. As in actually speaking, as the example JM gave. It does seem to speak of discerning what God seems to be saying THROUGH some experience or through what may have happened during prayer? So that it does engage people in conversation and sharing of experiences, making the act of sharing and gathering in God's name... ACTIVE... rather than passive.

Which is what we do when we share and discuss with one another as well. So I am all for that.

I just am not seeing actual conversation described in that article between man and Christ; from Christ TO man.

I'm not criticizing it. Just noting what is not there.


Peace,
tammy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:44 pm
Posts: 1323
hey charilko....btw, may i call you cha?

i was just [[ EDITED TO CLARIFY: after i posted the essay, you will see, i went back in and highlighted 'stuff']] highlighting what stood out for me in that essay. I simply entered "conversing opposed to praying" into google. Grabbed it from first few hits.

Makes perfect sense. I recall the "created in His image". It would stand to reason, and logic, that surely you can converse in a friendly, HUMAN manner. As we are all One.

I'm on a ride right now charilko. It is strating out real slow, as I told, yes, told, declared, proclaimed even, the Conductor that all the rides I've been on my life thusfar, have made me extremely ill, in various degrees of my humanity; so to please take it real slow.

So far, so Good.

ha, i keep sayin' i'm gonna log off, but then i see an item i want to comment or highlight a thought in my head....this new 'tude is not so bad, ya know?

_________________
Image "I am proud to say that I will not lift one finger ( except my middle finger) for the WTBTS."


Last edited by s-Kally on Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:44 pm
Posts: 1323
Christ talking back? As in sass? Or as in a reply or rebuttal or feedback? What type do you speak of, if any I mentioned?

_________________
Image "I am proud to say that I will not lift one finger ( except my middle finger) for the WTBTS."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:19 am
Posts: 3402
s-Kally wrote:
Christ talking back? As in sass? Or as in a reply or rebuttal or feedback? What type do you speak of, if any I mentioned?


LOL... sorry, I thought that too when I wrote it out. I meant as in a reply, not sass ; )



I am also glad, and meant to mention it, that you are finding peace and listening, and taking things as slow or fast as you are capable of right now.

Peace!

tammy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:44 pm
Posts: 1323
tammy,

Has it EVER occured to you that Humans, Being CAN teach Christ a few things? And perhaps has?!

To me, to even get to a point where this could Be possible, is amazing. To say the least.

THAT is an absolute open mind. And an open mind is a free mind. That is where I strive to Be now, for the rest of my days as a useful, helpful Human, Being on this Earth.

btw, Christ has never talked back to me. THAT would be rude and disrespectful as WE ARE EQUAL IN SPIRIT.

Have a pleasant evening.

_________________
Image "I am proud to say that I will not lift one finger ( except my middle finger) for the WTBTS."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:19 am
Posts: 3402
Quote:
Has it EVER occured to you that Humans, Being CAN teach Christ a few things? And perhaps has?!


Perhaps.

But teach Him about love, mercy, forgiveness, truth, faith? No, that has not occurred to me. He is the Teacher. God IS love, and Christ IS truth... who comes FROM God (love), so it would be Him who teaches us about love, and all that stems from love. Though some people DO have love within them, by nature. The law (of love) written on their hearts.

Quote:
To me, to even get to a point where this could Be possible, is amazing. To say the least.


I think I understand. Are you talking about self-worth? Rather than the guilt and 'spiritual beatings' that many men and religions can do to a man (or a woman)?

(They should be listening to Him!)

Quote:
THAT is an absolute open mind. And an open mind is a free mind. That is where I strive to Be now, for the rest of my days as a useful, helpful Human, Being on this Earth.



I am glad for you then. Not trying to knock any of that.

Quote:
btw, Christ has never talked back to me. THAT would be rude and disrespectful as WE ARE EQUAL IN SPIRIT.


You're talking about 'sass' right?

(not sure I understand what you mean by equal in spirit)

Quote:
Have a pleasant evening.



You also, sKally!

Peace,
tammy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:44 pm
Posts: 1323
I'm not meaning to Be complicated tammy.

I'm trying to stay in a state of Learning, not Knowing.

It seems we may clash in this regard; as I know Nothing, and am Fine in Knowing It [nothing].
Though it seems you Know, and thus nothing more is to Be learned. [on this subject]. I trust it is why you keep asking for clarifications.

Christ Learns from Us, We Learn from Him. What is complicated? It is an equal klass.

Good night tammy. I'm on a new rode of late. I can't explain the universe or anything else anymore, or why people do and live the ways that they do, but they do. As I do too. And I/m Learning, a new Way to function, yet it is slow going right now.

I do know however, that whatever it is that has taken hold of my SELF...ITS CHRIST, ITS GOD, ITS ME, ITS YOU, ITS THE UNIVERSE, ITS ALL ON ONE THREAD OF LIFE.

_________________
Image "I am proud to say that I will not lift one finger ( except my middle finger) for the WTBTS."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:19 am
Posts: 3402
Quote:
I'm trying to stay in a state of Learning, not Knowing.


I can respect that and your choice.


Peace sKally,

tammy


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:07 pm
Posts: 2474
Thank you for sharing this article.
I appreciate the other comments and I would like to comment on this part.

He would suggest ways to pray, scripture passages to meditate on, scenes to imagine, ideas to ponder. Then he and his friends would talk about what happened in prayer. Together they would discern how God seemed to be leading them.



I noticed after HE and His friends prayed, they made no claim to receiving an answer back from the one that Jah says speaks to US NOW! That is the SON! One of the wonderful things that Holy Spirit does since its outpouring.

It mentions THEY WOULD DISCERN how God SEEMED to be leading them?

So no mention of a true conversation which would be back and forth right?
Doesn't HE, Jah lead or speak to us by means of a son, CHRIST ? What is there to discern? Jah has told us how he leads us. He said to " LISTEN TO THE SON!"

I still see the prayer, and all the wonderful things the article says to ask for, but no real immediate answer or conversation like you can receive when your speaking to your best friend in the same room as you.

Just my thought on it
Justmom


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 5:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5133
Quote:
I'm trying to stay in a state of Learning, not Knowing.


Interestingly, dear Skally (peace!), Christ was recorded to have said:

"THIS means everlasting life, their KNOWING you, the true God AND the One you sent forth..." Not "... their being in a continually state of learing ABOUT you (which is what is implied by the WTBTS translation of "taking in knowledge. Perhaps a quick review of the definition of "conversation" will help, though:

Quote:
con·ver·sa·tion/ˌkɒnvərˈseɪʃən/ Show Spelled [kon-ver-sey-shuhn] Show IPA
noun
1. informal interchange of thoughts, information, etc., by spoken words; oral communication between persons; talk; colloquy.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/conversation



And...

Quote:
a. The spoken exchange of thoughts, opinions, and feelings; talk.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/conversation



And...

Quote:
2a (1) : oral exchange of sentiments, observations, opinions, or ideas (2) : an instance of such exchange : talk

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conversation



And what about:

Quote:
a form of interactive, spontaneous communication between two or more people who are following rules of etiquette. It is polite give and take of subjects thought of by people talking with each other for company.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversation


I am of the mind, then, given the "false stylus of the scribes"... whoEVER they may be... that just because "someone" MODERNLY says that "prayer is conversation"... doesn't change what CHRIST thought it was... and said how it was to be done... and to Whom. Matthew 6:5-13

Now if someone isn't claiming to KNOW Christ, or be in UNION with him... or even a FOLLOWER of him... then prayer certain can be/IS what such ONE chooses it to be. But if one is claiming a relationship with CHRIST, should not that one FOLLOW what HE says about prayer? Including WHOM to pray TO... and HOW? Else, isn't such one following what some OTHER says about "prayer"... including themselves? How, though, is such one truly joined with Christ... if they don't even BELIEVE, let alone DO... the things HE said?

Just sayin'.

Again, peace!

A slave of Christ

Shellama


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 1:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 2:11 pm
Posts: 866
A mind open to learning, and appreciating and genuinely respecting other viewpoints is a great gift, and something we should all aspire to.

Ability and willingness to understand what the other is meaning behind the words we ourselves use reveals true love.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5133
Quote:
A mind open to learning, and appreciating and genuinely respecting other viewpoints is a great gift, and something we should all aspire to.


For some, this is perhaps true, dear Char (peace to you!). May I ask... would that also hold true as to the viewpoints of, say, Jim Jones? Pol Pot? Idi Amin? Mussolini? Hirohito? Pooky the Gang-Banger? Pablo the Mexican Drug Cartel Lord? I personally think that we were to ask a number of former JWs, including perhaps yourself, whether this is something we "should all aspire to," we would hear a different opinion. Indeed, how such open mindedness, appreciation, and respect can also be a danger.

Quote:
Ability and willingness to understand what the other is meaning behind the words we ourselves use reveals true love.


To understand, yes. Absolutely. We should... perhaps even MUST... understand others viewpoints. But that understanding does not necessarily mean appreciating or even respecting. SOME viewpoints should NOT be appreciated/respected. Some MUST not be.

Since I don't personally know the heart of another, and thus the source and motivation for HIS/HER viewpoint... I have to rely on another to guide ME. For ME, then, rather than aspiring to learn from other humans and/or appreciating/genuninely respecting THEIR viewpoints, aspiring to learn from CHRIST... and appreciating and genuinely respecting HIS viewpoint... is tantamount. HE, then, tells me which viewpoints presented by humans should be appreciated and genuinely respected... and which should not. And contrary to what most humans want to BELIEVE (because they are human... and of course, the world is fond of its own)... very FEW viewpoints SHOULD be appreciated/genuinely respected. Most religious and other world leaders know this, which is why the POV of the laity/layman... is virtually disregarded (except, perhaps, where there are many with the SAME POV... although, as you can see in Egypt, Syria, even the U.S., etc., that's not necessarily true).

Everyone has an opinion/viewpoint. Not all are to even be regarded, let alone respected, though. Because not all are TRUTH; many are nothing more than a means to fulfill some personal need to be heard, agreed with, accepted... and gain power over others.

Yet, some cannot respect THAT viewpoint. Why? Because it doesn't fit with their viewpoint, yes, but mostly because it isn't a PC POV. "Politically" correct means saying things that are inclusive of ALL, and either excluding none or make distinctions between any. And so most roll their eyes and poo-poo such viewpoints. Yet, they cry out for the same consideration as to THEIR viewpoints. They can't see, however, how they themselves deny others what they want to receive.

But political correctness is a farce. Because in SOME things there IS exclusion of others... and always WILL be. We don't... and can't... ALL belong to the same club. Sometimes due to our own CHOICES (which choose NOT to accept the particular "rules" - for instance, to be a JW). That doesn't mean a lack of love or even the presence of hate from those who DO belong (although, in that case, it does - LOLOLOL!). It just means that there ARE differences... even between people... in our world.

Peace!

A slave of Christ,

Shellama, who's never had a single desire to live in a gated community or belong to a country club, whether membership is limited to males or includes females...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 12:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 2:11 pm
Posts: 866
I think you may possibly have misunderstood what I meant, Shelby.

I didn't mean that we should blindly and indiscriminately accept and take on board anyone's viewpoint, let alone those that are clearly bad. I meant that a mind open to the viewpoints of others is good, as in being prepared to listen and give them due onside ration, perhaps, if such is appropriate.

That doesn't mean that one's mind should be unable to exercise discernment. It's very important to use that gift, isn't it? for discernment, good judgement, is truly a gift from God.

It wouldn't take as much as a second, I should think, to discern pure evil, would it?

Openness and allowing another person's view to be heard is, in ordinary instances, not of course extremes, surely desirable? Nor does such openness suggest in any way that one would change one's own views, if they are strongly-held beliefs, though organisations such as the Watchtower rely on the persuasiveness of their literature and the Witnesses to make use of other people's willingness to listen.

And there's the disadvantage of my own argument! For it was exactly that scenario, of willingness to allow the other to state their point of view, that got me ensnared by the Watchtower. If it hadn't been for the crass behaviour of two elders I might have become though lay and completely ensnared. I certainly came within a hair's breadth of that happening!

So, all in all, yes, respect for the other is a good thing in principle but one needs to be wary of those intent on abusing that very good inclination in others. And respect and openness does not include at all, in any way, the adoption of the other's views.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 327 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group