Quote:
A mind open to learning, and appreciating and genuinely respecting other viewpoints is a great gift, and something we should all aspire to.
For some, this is perhaps true, dear Char (peace to you!). May I ask... would that also hold true as to the viewpoints of, say, Jim Jones? Pol Pot? Idi Amin? Mussolini? Hirohito? Pooky the Gang-Banger? Pablo the Mexican Drug Cartel Lord? I personally think that we were to ask a number of former JWs, including perhaps yourself, whether this is something we "should all aspire to," we would hear a different opinion. Indeed, how such open mindedness, appreciation, and respect can also be a danger.
Quote:
Ability and willingness to understand what the other is meaning behind the words we ourselves use reveals true love.
To understand, yes. Absolutely. We should... perhaps even MUST... understand others viewpoints. But that understanding does not necessarily mean appreciating or even respecting. SOME viewpoints should NOT be appreciated/respected. Some MUST not be.
Since I don't personally know the
heart of another, and thus the source and motivation for HIS/HER viewpoint... I have to rely on another to guide ME. For ME, then, rather than aspiring to learn from other humans and/or appreciating/genuninely respecting THEIR viewpoints, aspiring to learn from CHRIST... and appreciating and genuinely respecting HIS viewpoint... is tantamount. HE, then, tells me which viewpoints presented by humans should be appreciated and genuinely respected...
and which should not. And contrary to what most humans want to BELIEVE (because they are human... and of course, the world is fond of its own)... very FEW viewpoints SHOULD be appreciated/genuinely respected. Most religious and other world leaders know this, which is why the POV of the laity/layman... is virtually disregarded (except, perhaps, where there are many with the SAME POV... although, as you can see in Egypt, Syria, even the U.S., etc., that's not necessarily true).
Everyone has an opinion/viewpoint. Not all are to even be regarded, let alone respected, though. Because not all are TRUTH; many are nothing more than a means to fulfill some personal need to be heard, agreed with, accepted... and gain power over others.
Yet, some cannot respect THAT viewpoint. Why? Because it doesn't fit with their viewpoint, yes, but mostly because it isn't a PC POV. "Politically" correct means saying things that are inclusive of ALL, and either excluding none or make distinctions between any. And so most roll their eyes and poo-poo such viewpoints. Yet, they cry out for the same consideration as to THEIR viewpoints. They can't see, however, how they themselves deny others what they want to receive.
But political correctness is a farce. Because in SOME things there IS exclusion of others... and always WILL be. We don't... and can't... ALL belong to the same club. Sometimes due to our own CHOICES (which choose NOT to accept the particular "rules" - for instance, to be a JW). That doesn't mean a lack of love or even the presence of hate from those who DO belong (although, in that case, it does - LOLOLOL!). It just means that there ARE differences... even between people... in our world.
Peace!
A slave of Christ,
Shellama, who's never had a single desire to live in a gated community or belong to a country club, whether membership is limited to males or includes females...