Quote:
I no longer have doubts that our Lord, and His Father, will take of our loved ones as well as us.
This is TRUE, dear tec (peace, luv!). Somewhere here I started to address but got sidetracked by puppy drama and now can't see where that was. So I will address it here and perhaps copy/paste it later when I find where it SHOULD go.
JAH is a God of love... and of service. Where is the love, though, to save one member of a household but not the rest? What joy would there be in being in "heaven," "the kingdom," "the new system" or what have you, if those YOU love are NOT there? Who would want to live... even forever... if some or none of the people they love aren't with them? Even for one who, say, is promised and taken away to live in the palace of a king: what joy is there if such a one has to leave his/her loved ones behind? Would even all the riches OF that kingdom suffice to replace their absence?
Personally for me, if my children weren't with me then I would see no point. Indeed, my children ARE the point: THEY are the reason I sought God, Christ, the kingdom in the FIRST place. To be THERE, however... WITHOUT them? No, can't see it. Don't WANT it. Or without my dear husband (not intending to leave him out, but just that my search started before him - it was our mutual searching, journies, and coming to Christ that brought us together. I digress.)
And then my Lord explained. Like the man Job, we... the members of his Body... can (must, actually) serve as "priests" for our households. In this way, WE can "offer up incense"... or prayers... on THEIR behalf. As Job did for HIS household. Through OUR faith, our ENTIRE households can be saved... as was the case with Rahab and Cornelius. And so, Peter is recorded by Luke to have said:
"The promise is for you... and for your children." Acts 2:39And even our dear Lord told the Samaritan woman to go and call her "husband" to come.
John 4:16Some teach... and thus others worry... though, that by "children" the promise means minor children. Does it, though? Were Noah's children minors when they were saved... because of HIS faith? Remember, they had wives so they were "of age."
Genesis 7:1, 7 How about Job's children? Remember, they each had their own house and so didn't even live with him!
Job 1:4Here's the thing: while the "law" that said the sins of the father were to come upon the heads of the children was done away with, the "law" that says the BLESSINGS of the father (or mother) can come upon the heads of children is NOT done away with. Why? Because LOVE is the NEW Law's fulfillment... and it would be a act of love to ALSO save those loved BY the one saved, those of his/her household, as well as those held near and dear to such one, yes? Yes!!
Which is what should compell ALL to seek God... and in the way HE says: not just for the sake of their OWN personal salvation...
but perhaps that of their entire household - even ALL of their loved ones, some of whom may NOT be family by means of FLESH but are considered "family" by means of LOVE... and even SPIRIT.
Acts 10:24That "way" is by means of and THROUGH the One who IS the Way of God: the "Door" that is the HOLY One of Israel and Holy Spirit, JAHESHUA, the Chosen One of JAH (MischaJah), JAH(veh) being the MOST Holy One of Israel and the ultimate source of Life.
So, if one is joined to Christ, in union with him... so have to have NO condemnation (
Romans 8:1), and continues to put faith in HIM... in his PROMISE... by means of listenig to his VOICE... one can have FAITH that their loved ones will be with them eternally. THAT was the promise made to Israel, the one that proceeded the promise for a kingdom. All of Israel looked FORWARD to the resurrection so as to be
REUNITED with loved ones (that may have died). For those who are in union with Christ, however, there is an ever "better" resurrection (
Hebrews 11:35-40): one to positions as kings and priests... and thus CO-rulers... with Christ.
But it is NOT a position that renders such ones separated from or in a different location than their loved ones... as at least one religious institution teaches. They are entirely in error in that teaching.
I hope this helps and, again, peace to you all!
A slave of Christ,
SA