HUGE smile! I LOVE it when he gives another something to substantiate what I've had the privilege of sharing (peace to you all, and thank you for sharing that, dear Tams - peace, luv!).
Here, we've been taught she [must have] arrived after our dear Lord, sort of sneaked in somehow, and began washing his feet. So, okay, she must have arrived, like, RIGHT after him. But then, we're supposed to believe that although she was a "tainted" woman [of the city] and so "beneath" those there, she was allowed to stay... for... what?? And THEN... she washes our dear Lord's feet with her tears and dries them with her hair. Wouldn't SOMEONE have said, "Hey, wait - what's she DOING??"
But no, nothing like that, at least not in the recorded account. Rather, we are told of just a man... a "clean" Pharisee... who wouldn't even put her out himself... thinking "If HE was who he wants us to believe HE is, HE would know what kind of WOMAN she is!" And we know the rest of the thought, don't we? "And not touch her or even let HER touch HIM! But he's LETTING her! I'm not so sure I'm so sure who HE is!" LOLOL!
BUT... if she was already THERE (and she would be, wouldn't she, if she LIVED there)... then her washing our dear Lord's feet from the time he entered... AND not being put out (for doing that in the way she did as well as for the "kind" of woman she was)... makes all the sense in the world! As truth always DOES!
THANK you, dear, dear Tams, for sharing this extra detail - WELL worth knowing!
Peace to you all!
YSSFS of Christ,
Shel
|