May you all have peace!
As most of you know, rarely have I attended a JW event over the past 25 years and NOT have received something from my Lord. It is almost always something new, something I had not known/thought of before, or put together so as to discern the truth. At times, I have been directed to share such with you. On a few occasions, I have been directed to approach and speak with the event speaker and last night was no exception. And what I was able to share with him and with you dear ones now is sublime, IMHO.
The discussion centered around some of the usual "points" brought out at a JW Memorial, those having to do with two "hopes," the one being "heavenly" and the other "earthly," and of course, who eats/drinks, who does not, and... remember this... OBEDIENCE [to God]. And, as usual, the point as to the "heavenly" hope was (purported to be) supported by Revelation 14:1 which, as we all know is used by the WTBTS to push that only 144,000 go to heaven:
"Then I saw, and look! the Lamb standing on Mount Zion, and with him 144,000 who have his name and the name of his Father written on their foreheads."
Supposedly, this verse "proves" that ONLY 144,000 go to heaven because they are the only ones John sees standing with the Lamb on Mount Zion. Seems plausible.
He then used their other "go to" set of verses to support another "hope," Isaiah 11:6-9 for folks who would stay on earth:
"The wolf will reside for a while with the lamb, And with the young goat the leopard will lie down, And the calf and the lion and the fattened animal will all be together; And a little boy will lead them. The cow and the bear will feed together, And their young will lie down together. The lion will eat straw like the bull. The nursing child will play over the lair of a cobra, And a weaned child will put his hand over the den of a poisonous snake. They will not cause any harm Or any ruin in all my holy mountain, Because the earth will certainly be filled with the knowledge of Jehovah As the waters cover the sea."
Supposedly these verses "prove" that some do NOT go to heaven because they include animals (at least, that's how the speaker explained it during our discussion, which I will get to in a sec). Also sounds plausible.
Except... and here is what I was directed to discuss with the speaker... both refer to events that occur... either "on Mount Zion" or in God's "holy mountain."
As I was sitting there listening to the speaker read Isaiah 11:9, my dear Lord asked me:
"Is not my Father's holy mountain the Mountain Sion?"
I was, like, wait... what, Lord? Well, yeah... yes! Yes, it is!
He then asked me,
"Then you are going to share that truth with the man?" (and he said his name, but I won't post it for the man's privacy - you never know who lurks here and who knows who and it is not my intent to persecute him here).
To which I said, "Of course I will, Lord, yes!"
And so, right after the event had ended I went up and introduced myself to the speaker, complimented him on giving a "lovely discourse" (and he DID present it in a very lovely way: gently, quietly, no fire and brimstone-ness, even if not truthFUL) and asked if I could have a moment of his time because there was something he'd said that "was confusing and seemed 'contradictory.'" He graciously agreed and so we sat down together.
I showed him Revelation 14:1 and said I was confused as to how that meant ONLY 144,000 would be in heaven... as far as "heaven" meant Mount Zion, when the other verses he shared (and then showed him Isaiah 11:6-9 showed folks THERE as ALSO being [in] God's "holy mountain." I asked him,
"Isn't God's holy mountain Mount Zion?"
His initial response was that Mount Sinai was God's holy mountain... which I had to kindly correct:
"I'm not sure that's accurate. Wasn't Mount Zion God's holy mountain because THAT is where His holy CITY and TEMPLE were built?
[At that moment, I heard that the man had seen the movie "Exodus" and recalled that in that film the character "Zipporah" told the character "Moses" that Mount Sinai was "God's mountain" and so that's really where he got that from, but was also leaning upon the WTBTS' false teaching as to Revelation 14:1. Which teaching, I might add, flies in the face of their own... ummmm... teaching, because the RNWT cross-references Isaiah 51:3; 56:7; and 65:25 as to the term "holy mountain" at Isaiah 11:9. Somehow, though, this man apparently doesn't know that. I am SURE he will look it up and SEE that, though, if for no other reason than to prove himself and the WTBTS "right" and me "wrong." I digress.]
I pressed on:
"The Jews don't consider Sinai God's holy mountain, though, do they, and I'm not sure Christians do either, because that was BEFORE God even DESIGNATED a holy mountain... right?"
To which he conceded his error (c'mon, he HAD to, as "Sinai" made absolutely NO sense... AND he probably remembered he only thought it because he'd heard it in a movie... that he probably wouldn't want anyone to know he even saw)... and apologized. At THAT point, I could literally SEE the tiny (very) light of TRUTH begin to go on behind his eyes as he thought about this. He then actually said,
"Yes, I can see that! I can see why you think that!
WHOOO-HOOO! Or, maybe not. In the very second after, I heard from my Lord to not get excited because "his training by the false prophets will allow him to dismiss this new TRUTH that he has just received." And so, just as quickly, I could "see" him seeking throughout his brain... and store of WTBTS teachings... for an explanation. Because this could NOT be right... right? BOTH places could NOT be the SAME mountain, else... no, no... can't be the same.
And so, I saw the light (of truth) flicker out, as the "light" of "knowledge" came on and he went on to say that the events in Isaiah could NOT be "heavenly" because there were animals in that account. I could also see the "triumph" in his eyes - ah, yes, THAT must be it! But it, too, was short-lived, because I responded,
"Yes, but God saves animals, too, does He not?"
This threw him, again, because he evidently did not believe God did and so responded that he didn't think so, to which I responded,
"Did He not save animals through the Flood?"
Again, a flicker of the light of TRUTH passed through his eyes, and he AGREED. Vehemently. Then... I could see him "searching" again, and he asked,
"So are you saying there are animals in HEAVEN??"
Hearing from my Lord not to go down THAT road as I would most assuredly lose him at this point... I said,
"I'm not saying THAT, but let me show you another verse," and took him to Revelation 21:2, which states:
"I also saw the holy city, New Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God and prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. "
I asked him, "Wasn't the OLD Jerusalem situated on TOP of Mount Zion?" to which he answered in the affirmative.
I was then directed to have him read verse 3, which states:
"With that I heard a loud voice from the throne say: “Look! The tent of God is with mankind, and he will reside with them, and they will be his people. And God himself will be with them."
and ask him,
"Does it say mankind will be with God... or GOD... will be with MANKIND?
I could almost smell the "smoke" as the "wheels" in his little-used thinking "parts" began to turn, this time. THIS time... his thinking had been cranked a little further past where it had ever been. I could almost see a look of pain... because this HURT, this new "exercise" of his thinking abilities!
But of course, then came the usual response:
"I'll have to do some research and get back to you on this. I need to have a Bible..."
Stutter, stutter, hem, haw... because we both HAD Bibles. His on the chair next to him, me on my android. But I didn't correct or press him. He, though, pressed ME and asked if I had ever had a Bible Study. I told him, truthfully, that I had actually studies with Jehovah's Witnesses at one point, but came to a point where I had to stop because they had a teaching and practice that I just could NOT reconcile with the teaching of Christ. Of course, his curiosity was peaked, and so he asked,
"What was it? What made you stop?"
OMGoodness, could he REALLY have just asked me that? Given me MORE time? Oh, sweet LORDY!
I said, "Let me show you," and took him to John 6:48-58.
I emphasized the word "anyone" in verses 50 and 51, and the phrases, "UNLESS you eat/drink," "NO life in yourselves," "EVERLASTING LIFE," "I WILL resurrect," and "remains in union with me and I union with them," and "will live BECAUSE of ME," in verses 51-58.
I said,
"See, that is what CHRIST said, said we are to DO, and I cannot reconcile NOT doing what he SAID, NOT being obedient to HIM. And HE said that UNLESS we eat his flesh and drink his blood, we have NO life in ourselves. How, then, can I even EXPECT everlasting life... resurrection... if I DON'T do what HE says I MUST do... in order to RECEIVE such?? So, no, I had to stop. God said we are to listen to HIS SON, and so I just COULDN'T disobey HIM... OR CHRIST... in this."
And again, I saw the light of truth go on in his eyes, this time, even brighter. I also saw great discomfort. And I immediately heard and so knew why: he was surprised at what he'd just read, that he'd never really "seen" those verses before, and that he, someone who was important enough to give a "MEMORIAL talk" didn't have words to explain... or refute... what I had just shown him.
Just as quickly, I saw the "wheels" being to turn, "searching." And... finding nothing. Which, unfortunately, resulted in a dismissal. Better to dismiss the whole thing, rather than even consider that the reason he COULDN'T find a response... is because the WTBTS had not actually GIVEN him one for THIS. At least, as far as he knew. Surely, they've responded... somewhere... somehow... and so, rather than allow this new truth to BLOOM... his training told him to shut down (any "contrary" talk). And so he did.
The light (of truth) went out, again.
And so I ended our discussion, but I was not discouraged, not at all. Because getting him to SEE... was not my point. Because before I even went up, I had asked my dear Lord whether this man would hear, COULD hear, and I was told that that was not MY concern. MY concern was to obey... and PLANT (the seed). It was up to JAH, through him (my Lord), whether to allow it to GROW.
And so I did it: planted a seed. I asked that it be allowed to grow, and will continue to ask, but I know it is not up to me nor my concern if it doesn't.
And there you have it. My 2015 WTBTS Memorial experience. I hope there is something encouraging in it for you dear ones. Maybe it will help those of you who need it, to rebut the WTBTS' false teaching of two hopes, at least as to the Body of Christ and there only being 144,000 who are part of the Bride and go to heaven (at least for a moment, while they are "married" to Christ, the Bridegroom). There are 144,000 from Israel, yes... as well as a great crowd out of EVERY nation, tribe, tongue, and people... and ALL, as part of the NEW Jerusalem, return to, and rule UPON the earth. NOT from "above" it.
They are on the earth, as are the sheep they rule over... and the animals and beasts they cohabitate with. They, as the NEW Jerusalem, come down OUT of heaven (after their marriage)... and it is by means of THEM, led by Christ, that God's WILL... IS done "ON EARTH [the physical realm]... AS it is done in heaven [the spirit realm]."
The greatest of love and peace to you ALL... and to your dear households.
Your servant, as I am servant to ALL those of the Household of God, Israel, and those who go with... sister... and fellow slave of Christ,
Shel
|