xjwsforChrist

PAULSACRAMENTO SAID

And I agree, to a point.
IF a core doctrine of a religion does advocate violence, then this religion can/has been a cause of war.
Not all religions are the same/created equal.
A religion that advocates human sacrifice for example or one that condones infanticide.

I agree that if a believer from a religion commits an act of violence and the core belief on that religion is to NOT commit violence then yes, the so-called believer and NOT the religion is at fault.
BUT if a religion condones violence and it's followers commit violence because of that, then it is the religions fault.

NAMBO SAID

Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:24 pm Post subject:
Another nail in another JW doctrine, re the Identity of Babylon the Great.

I arrived at the conclusion BTG wasn't Christendom a long time ago but Jerusalem and the International banking families that founded it.

Rev 18 24 And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth.

So if religions are not the cause of wars, then who is and does it match my conclusion that its the big bankers that have been pulling the strings?

As an example of just one war that bankers rather than religion seemed to cause, and a lot of blood spilt on the skirts of BTG, WW2.
I had previously read that the Treaty of Versailles ensured the rise of a Hitler figure and another war, and that British Prime-minister David Lloyd George had reported that International bankers had ruled over the proceedings with the authority of absolute Monarchs, and remember how BTG has a kingdom over the kings of the world.

So a quick Google on the subject of bankers behind WW2 brings up a lot of information such as this:- http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news- ... s-and-wwii

If anybody considers it was Rome and false religion behind WW2, please elaborate.