xjwsforChrist

Non-Religious Christian Spirituality
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:02 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:12 pm
Posts: 34
And this is, speaking the Pure Language, the Good News:

Image

__
Focus
("Bad News for the WTS" Class)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5093
Is that an actual cover??! (peace to you!)

If so, it may well have the affect they want: SCARING people into the WTBTS... and what a CHEAP trick! Where is CHRIST in that? Oh, wait: where is Christ in the WTBTS.

If real, cover totally makes sense, now.

Peace to you!

Your servant and a slave of Christ,

Shellamar


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:12 pm
Posts: 34
The cover is EVERY BIT AS REAL as the QFR "Are cats for true Christians?", which I believe is to be found inside. Here:

Quote:
Are Cats For True Christians?

Is it appropriate for a Christian to own a cat, in light of their past pagan religious affiliation and the medical information that is now coming to light? -J.R., U.S.A.

It would be misleading to answer this question with either a simple 'Yes' or a 'No.' The Scriptural answer of necessity must be a 'qualified' one, and it is easy to see why. Many conscientious ones among Jehovah's people today have wondered if Christians should own cats in view of their somewhat sordid symbolic history and the many health risks associated therewith. While we would not wish to state an opinion on what must remain a matter of personal preference, what is acceptable to one person may, although unintentionally, stumble another. This can become a life-or-death issue since to move the steps of a brother away from the path of Christ's ransom sacrifice is tantamount to 'putting a millstone around the neck and being thrown into the sea.' -Matt. 18:6. Clearly, in a matter where our eternal salvation is involved, the mature Christian will not pursue a purely selfish course based on his own personal choices, but will adopt a congregational viewpoint as scripturally prescribed.

First, let us consider what most scholars agree is the etymology (word derivation) for the English term 'cat'. When analyzed with the Latin 'felis cattus domesticus', the original Koine Greek is 'cur.io huma bes-tia', means 'a contemporary housecat with all of its beastly identifying characteristics and behavior.' A faithful servant of Jehovah would quickly notice that the nature of a cat is so marked as being 'beastly'. The Bible makes clear reference to this condition when describing parts of Satan's organizations, both past and present. For instance, consider the fearsome 'beasts' as described in the book of Daniel or the 'scarlet colored wild beast' in Rev. 17:3. The demons entered the swine when rebuked by Jesus showing the potential harm and malevolent spirit control to which a Christian may be potentially exposed. Lest we forget the story of Nebuchadnezzar and the condition of God's enemy when being humbled by Jehovah, the student of God's Holy word would ask - is it by accident that the Bible in the book of Daniel describes his experience as a 'beast' of the field? Hardly so!

Clearly, the Bible - by using this kind of terminology - shows beyond any reasonable doubt that the basic nature of cats, while created perfect by God, has become evil or 'beastlike' since the fall of Adam six thousand years ago, and more probably, since the Great Flood of Noah's time (c2350 B.C.E.). This is a development of the condition borne by the 'Original Serpent', the 'Great Dragon' Lucifer himself. (Gen. 3:1) Indeed, modern studies of classification of cats, while not necessarily being reliable as they may be based on the discredited 'theory' of evolution, strongly associate felines with serpents (despite some external differences in physiology and morphology, which confuse those who do not study these matters deeply).

There are numerous reasons why a loyal dedicated servant of God should use his Bible-trained conscience to arrive at a proper understanding of why cats are not advisable as pets or companions for Christians. Consider, then, the following facts:

It was a common practice in ancient Egypt to worship or idolize cats as 'gods'. Indeed, after death many cats were mummified, venerated and sacrifices were made to them. As Christians we observe not only the Mosaic Law, but also the 'necessary things,' identified by the Apostles at Jerusalem, to include the following edict: '(1) Abstain from sacrifices to idols'. We are to 'guard ourselves from idols' and 'worship no other gods'. Such feline influence could lead to idolatry and thereby 'grieve Jehovah's Spirit' with tragic consequences. May we never take for granted Jehovah's wise and generous counsel brought to you by your spiritual brothers in the pages of this magazine!

The Bible does not say that cats were not present at Herod's birthday party when John the Baptist was beheaded. History shows that cats were most likely present at this tragic party that Jehovah did not approve of. Clearly then, as loyal Christians, why would we even want to associate with animals that are without a doubt of such bad influence, remembering how true are the Bible's words: 'Bad associations spoil useful habits'! -1 Cor. 15:33. Some have exposed themselves to possible spiritual contamination in this way. To invite cats in our house is to toy with disaster. Can one deny that the chance exists that the same grave consequences could visit your home that fell upon John? Clearly, God disapproved of this 'birthday' party. Should we not then disapprove (without showing any malicious intent, only Godly hatred) of cats the way the scriptures recommend?

Throughout history, particularly in the middle ages and reaching its climax in the Salem Witch trials of the seventeenth century, cats were recognized by the forces of Christendom as familiars and carriers if not direct incarnates of demons. While, in common with most beliefs of the empire of false religion, no evidence has ever been found to support this, the symbolism of cats still remain within the public psyche, and involvement with them reflects poorly on God's footstools and footstep followers. Many pagan faiths still conclude that black cats bring ill-luck and possess demonic forces, while we have shown that it is, instead, all cats that share these perceived characteristics. Since cats were associated with the devil, could we as faithful and dedicated servants of God therefore contaminate ourselves by exposure to a 'living symbol' of satanic incarnation? How would this reflect on God's name and that of his visible, earthly organization? Would we want to be linked with a symbol of Satan, the 'god of this beastly system of things'?

The careful student of the Bible will acknowledge that nowhere within it is any species ('kind') of cat referred to in favorable terms. In fact, was it not lions of the first century who the Devil used to devour faithful Christians? Jehovah Himself 'stopped up the mouths of the lions' (Dan. 6:22) in Daniel's day. True, the small housecats of today are not quite lions, but being of the same accursed animal family used by God's enemies on numerous occasions throughout history, would it be wise or prudent to own one? In addition, by owing any type of cat (feline), would we not give an appearance of condoning their evil deeds throughout recorded Bible and secular history? The Bible makes clear that God's people are 'no part of this world' (John 15:19) and that we are 'not to share in the sins of others', consume lecithin within nutritive cereal or 'candy' bars, or do other things directly banned in Holy Scripture.

The demeanor of a cat is seen by many honest-hearted observers as reflecting some supernatural, unnatural proclivity towards malice or evil. And, it is a well-known fact that cats are impossible to tame, teach or raise in the truth. The cat has a rebellious, independent spirit. While the animal itself may be unaware of this tragic condition, it serves only its true master - Satan, the Devil.

The scriptures clearly indicate that neither Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, faithful Job, the Apostles, Jesus nor any other human bearing God's favor himself owned a cat. Should we simply assume that this is a mere coincidence? Surely not! This was most likely because they didn't want to be like the pagan contemporaries of their respective days who showed no regard for how God feels about owning a cat. In harmony with the pattern set by the faithful prophets and worthies of old, it would therefore not be fitting for the true Christian today to own a cat.

But, the most modern scientific evidence also supports the Biblical view. Contrary to popular beliefs among worldly people, cats are unhygienic animals. Recently the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) announced that 'Cats .. can shed Salmonella in their feces, which can spread the bacterial infection to humans'. Salmonella (salmonella typhimurium) creates a condition of 'week-long diarrhea, abdominal cramps and in some instances, hospitalization.' Would we be showing the proper respect to our life, Creator and to our 'neighbor' by exposing ourselves and others to this potentially deadly disease? Would this be seen by your brothers, and by those showing an interest in God's word, as giving a good witness?

Additionally, cats practice many unclean habits not befitting a Christian household: coughing up fur balls, licking inappropriate body areas on their own bodies (inappropriate handling) and even, in some cases, on the bodies of their human owners (wrongful motive?), urination on the floor, vocal and blatant promiscuity (unknown to any other species, all others being endowed with Godly chastity and decorum) and widespread sexual misconduct without the benefit or sanctity of holy matrimony, even orgiastic practices, substance abuse of catnip (an intoxicating herb) which produces conditions akin to drunkenness, stealing food from the table, producing ungodly sounds, excessive playfulness and the employment of devices not known to have been used by Jesus, the conducting of its unholy business under the cover of the darkness of night, and so on. What sort of example does this give our young ones endeavoring to faithfully serve Jehovah? The Bible clearly shows that 'neither fornicators .. nor thieves .. nor drunkards .. nor revilers .. will inherit the Kingdom.' (1 Cor. 6:9-11)

It must not be forgotten that the feline is a killer. It eats mice and their kind, which is forbidden to Christians and their pets (Lev. 11:29, Isa. 66:17). But, far more serious, is the matter of the wanton consumption of the undrained corpses of the victims of this nocturnal creature; eating bodies filled with God's sacred blood is not a matter to be trifled with (Gen. 9:3,4; Lev. 3:17; Deut. 12:16,23,24; Acts 15:20,28,29). In an earlier article in The Watchtower, we have shown that it would be improper for a Christian to permit a veterinarian to give blood transfusions to his pet, for animal feed known to contain blood to be served to a pet or a farm animal under one's jurisdiction, or to employ any fertilizer that is known to have blood in it (w64 2/15 127-8). By allowing one's cat to roam uncontrolled, the Christian becomes a willing party to, even a conspirator within, this serious breach of God's law of life.

In addition, the Apostle Paul admonishes us to 'quit mixing in company .. not even eating with such an unclean [one].' -1 Cor. 5:9-11; Mark 2:13-17. Although Paul was speaking primarily about Christians who fell into sin, there is no reason to conclude that this inspired Biblical principle cannot be applied to association with cats. Uncleanness in any form is condemned by Jehovah and the fact that the Apostle Paul made no distinction when it came to associating with housecats proves beyond a doubt to the right-thinking worshiper of Jehovah that loyal Christians must avoid all association with all sources of uncleanness. This would logically include animals that either harbor these tendencies or indulge in such practices.

Of course, while demonstrating one's obedience to God's lovingly-issued commandments, one must do so without any spirit of meanness or ill-will towards these Satanic creatures, though they represent God's enemies. Instead, mature Christians 'feel a loathing' toward those, including cats, who have voluntarily or otherwise made themselves God's enemies, and they leave it to Jehovah to execute vengeance. -Job 13:16; Romans 12:19; 2 John 9,10.

Are we not grateful for this insight on God's viewpoint regarding such matters? True worshipers follow closely God's mandates on cleanness to their eternal benefit! Sister N.K. from Virginia, U.S.A. tells us that since getting rid of her cat, she has not had to be preoccupied with cleaning the litter box or wasting valuable time better spent pursuing kingdom interests with the burden of purchasing cat food. This has allowed her to become a full-time pioneer; she finds that it is now easier to meet her allotted hours in field service. Godwin, a brother from Sierra Leone, puts it this way: 'I'm so grateful that God's organization is kept clean! It has freed me from the burden of owning a cat and all the spiritual pitfalls and financial commitments that go with it. I hope all the brothers will realize how the Devil subtly uses cats to corrupt and distract us from the disciple-making work.' (Matt. 24:14). What fine examples of faithfulness!

The question of how to dispose of one's unwanted cat is a serious matter. Would it be proper to hand over such a creature of Satan to a person of the world? We see no immediate problem with this, as such a person is already immersed in the wicked ways of this system of things, and so a beastly companion would be a fitting one indeed. They could accompany eachother on the road to destruction, through ignoring God's generous gift of life proffered via His spirit-begotten earthly organization. It is on this same sound principle that a Christian doctor would have no reason to deny blood transfusions to a worldly patient. If, on the other hand, one took the view stated on page 128 of the abovementioned Watchtower, and consider that the pet or any other animal is under the ultimate jurisdiction of a Christian, who therefore bears responsibilities (Eccl. 12:13,14; Jas. 4:17, 1 Pet. 3:21) that are essentially parental in nature. The cat is a dependant. In harmony with this, surely it is the parent's obligation before God to ensure the feline pet is treated as one would an unruly child who repeatedly refused to obey its parents, or of one who committed apostasy. Unfortunately in the case of human offspring, one is limited by the laws of the higher authorities of the land as to what scripturally-ordained punishment may be meted out, as compliance with both sets of laws is necessary in such areas. This may not always be the case in terms of felines, where the fact that we are not living in theocratic countries may not prove such an impediment to what God requires of us, as manmade law may not afford such unmerited protection to cats as it does to humans. God's soldiers would be mindful to apply, where the case merited it and local custom did not prohibit it, the principle of Deut. 21:18-21 which states that: 'In case a man happens to have a [dependant] who is stubborn and rebellious, he not listening to the voice of his [guardian], and they have corrected him but he will not listen to them, his [guardian] must also take hold of him and bring him out to the older men of his city and to the gate of his place, and they must say to the older men of his city, 'This [dependant] of ours is stubborn and rebellious; he is not listening to our voice, being a glutton and a drunkard.' Then all the men of his city must pelt him with stones, and he must die.' The mature follower of Jehovah will do well to be reminded of God's advice in page 503 of The Watchtower of November 15, 1952 where it was held that 'In the case where a father or mother or son or daughter is disfellowshiped, how should such person be treated by members of the family in their family relationship? .. We are not living today among theocratic nations where such members of our fleshly family relationship could be exterminated for apostasy from God and his theocratic organization, as was possible and was ordered in the nation of Israel in the wilderness of Sinai and in the land of Palestine. 'Thou shalt surely kill him; thy hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. And thou shalt stone him to death with stones, because he hath sought to draw thee away from Jehovah thy God, .. And all Israel shall hear, and fear, and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is in the midst of thee.' -Deut. 13:6-11, AS.' Of course, we can take no legal responsibility for anything which results from your voluntary application of your interpretation of such Biblical principles as you may believe that we have brought to your attention.

As loyal followers of Jehovah's thinking on this matter, we can rejoice in the fact that in the new system, the incoming theocracy and World Order, the 'lion will lie down with the lamb' -Isa. 11:6-7. Yes, when Satan is finally abyssed, the 'beastly' nature of felines will be forever abolished, and they will be fit companions for humans on Paradise Earth! But until that rapidly-approaching time, God will reward all of our efforts to maintain integrity by loyally submitting to the leading of his spirit expressed through the loving guidance of the 'faithful and discreet slave'. -Matt. 24:45-47


__
Focus
("Author" Class)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5093
I don't know where you got that, dear Focus (peace to you!)... and FAR be it from ME to defend ANYTHING published by the WTBTS... but I don't think that is an authentic publication... or article. I looked up the actual 2/1/14 WT and that's not it, at least not in English. Nor is that an article in that volume.

Please verify that it is legit? If not, I think it is VERY irresponsible to post it as such. Doing so is what KEEPS folks in the WTBTS because they point to stuff like this as "lying" on them.

If I'm wrong, I apologize... but I can't find this particular 'February 1, 2014" version. Do you have a link?

Peace!

A slave of Christ,

Shellamar


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5093
Ahhh, "EVERY BIT AS REAL AS"... I "see."

A favor, dear one (peace!)? Please include some kind of a disclaimer, even cursory commentary, if necessary, when such posts are NOT authentic? We do NOT want to further mislead folks, especially by presenting false things as true. I get it that you may have intended this tongue-in-cheek; keep in mind, though, this is not one of the usual "ex"JW sites. To further mislead folks, even under the guise of exposing the WTBTS, is NOT what we're about.

Someone just passing through could see that, then believe WE are making up LIES about the WTBTS. In addition, the depiction, while perhaps an attempt at "humor," COULD be construed as libel, given what it SHOWS and the accompanying comments.

Please, going forward, be clearer? Thank you!

Peace to you!

Your servant and a slave of Christ,

Shellamar


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:12 pm
Posts: 34
AGuest wrote:
I looked up the actual 2/1/14 WT

Well, look up:
w64 2/15 127-8
as referred to in the text, and you will find the reference is very real and relevant.


Last edited by John Foster on Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:12 pm
Posts: 34
AGuest wrote:
perhaps an attempt at "humor,"

??
There is nothing whatsoever humorous about the central message of the murderous, barbaric Watchtower Cult:

"This is the Good News - join us immediately, or you and your minor kids will be slaughtered by our Leader Osama Jeebus bin Jehooverladen at Armageddon (scheduled for tomorrow)"

Quote:
COULD be construed as libel, given what it SHOWS and the accompanying comments.

Nonsense. You are an ignoramus about the law, as I have shown in another thread.
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2169

Please do not force me to conclude that you have some screws loose. Occam's Razor has already delivered its verdict.

__
Focus
("Sufferin'" Class)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 7:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5093
Quote:
Well, look up: w64 2/15 127-8 as referred to in the text, and you will find the reference is very real and relevant.


Well, okay, dear one (peace!)... although that's not the date on the "WT" cover you posted... I Googled your reference and the only thing close that came up was this:

http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/jw/frie ... -lsyPldWh8

I'm not sure, but it doesn't seem to comport with what you posted (i.e., owning cats, versus transfusing pet cats). You are MORE than welcome to provide a better link... if you have one... but I think that like ME, perhaps you've been the victim of humor. No worries... happens to even the best of us, from time to time.

Quote:
There is nothing whatsoever humorous about the central message of the murderous, barbaric Watchtower Cult:


I absolutely AGREE! Which is why I took issue with your post. Seems SOMEONE thought it was humorous to create a false story, though. I mean, I get that it's supposed to be... what, satire? Tongue in cheek? But, again, no need to be embarrassed. I wasn't when I learned you'd fooled ME with the article. Again, stuff happens... even to the BEST of us.

Quote:
"This is the Good News - join us immediately, or you and your minor kids will be slaughtered by our Leader Osama Jeebus bin Jehooverladen at Armageddon (scheduled for tomorrow)"


Yeah. Which is why deviating from the FACTS... and creating one's OWN "WT article" doesn't help. Only makes THEM look good ("See?! They're LYING on us! We didn't even PUBLISH that!"). Undermines the credibility of those who do it. SURELY, your intelligence allows you to see that?

Quote:
Quote:
COULD be construed as libel, given what it SHOWS and the accompanying comments.


Yes.

Quote:
Nonsense. You are an ignoramus about the law, as I have shown in another thread.
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2169


Not that you actually SHOWED anything (talk is cheap, luv... but, we'll get to that soon enough), but an entire year of Torts tells ME that such COULD be construed as libel. I could certainly make a legal argument for it. And if I can, I've no doubt the WTBTS lawyers could. Regardless, you are not responsible or liable for this site. I am, though, so I have to know these things. In spite of my law degree. It's just prudent business sense, luv.

Quote:
Please do not force me to conclude that you have some screws loose. Occam's Razor has already delivered its verdict.


I can't force you to do anything. Except maybe comport yourself with the rule... and related guidelines... of this forum. THAT I can do, luv. No need to, just yet... but just in case you were wonderin'. See, I have a teenchie bit of clout with the Admin and mods. I don't use it... unless I'm forced to. And, well, since you brought up folks forcing folks to do stuff... well, I just thought I'd go with that topic, here.

Ummmmm... here's what's ol' his name's razor back. Be careful wielding it, though, as you might cut yourself if you don't know what you're doing (with it).

Peace!

YOUR servant and a slave of Christ,

Shellamar


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:12 pm
Posts: 34
If you have a law degree, Shellamar, then I'm a Chinaman. Your B.S. cuts zero ice with me.

And your ignorant babble on the quarantined thread, showing you don't know even the first thing about copyright, model releases and the "fair use" exclusions present in all possible relevant jurisdictions (a triple hit, three items of ignorance in one go) blows your credibility to zero.

I don't like liars, especially not holier-than-thou ones.

Don't argue law with an attorney, peabrain.

WHACK!!
__
Focus
("Anti-Stupid" Class)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:07 pm
Posts: 2461
John Foster wrote:
If you have a law degree, Shellamar, then I'm a Chinaman. Your B.S. cuts zero ice with me.

And your ignorant babble on the quarantined thread, showing you don't know even the first thing about copyright, model releases and the "fair use" exclusions present in all possible relevant jurisdictions (a triple hit, three items of ignorance in one go) blows your credibility to zero.

I don't like liars, especially not holier-than-thou ones.

Don't argue law with an attorney, peabrain.

WHACK!!
__
Focus
("Anti-Stupid" Class)



Greetings to you dear John foster,

And my question to you is...really?? This type of insult is uncalled for and I don't know your history, but you are holding on to some serious unresolved issues and are lashing out at the wrong peeps. We are not your enemy. We don't have to see eye to eye on things, but this is uncalled for.

An FYI....Shelby has a law degree. I personally attended her graduation! But not sure if that's gonna matter with you or not.

May you have peace, Kim


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5093
Quote:
If you have a law degree, Shellamar, then I'm a Chinaman.


Well, then... píng'ān gěi nǐ, qīn'ài de!! Or, if you prefer:

平安给你,亲爱的!

Quote:
Your B.S. cuts zero ice with me.


Maybe the problem lies with YOUR B.S. detector blade. It seems to be broken. 'Cause right now it's mistaking truth (from me) as B.S.... and B.S. (from you)... as truth. Mayhaps you need a "sword" (of truth) to help you sharpen it.

Quote:
And your ignorant babble on the quarantined thread,


Well, you know what they say about one man's babble...

Quote:
showing you don't know even the first thing about copyright, model releases and the "fair use" exclusions present in all possible relevant jurisdictions (a triple hit, three items of ignorance in one go) blows your credibility to zero.


I admit I'm not an EXPERT on such matters, legal or otherwise...but I have a daughter who is a model... and a son who manages her... and I am involved in reviewing HER contracts... AND I am partially responsible for this forum... so... I don't think it matters what YOU think I know... or have... HERE, luv.

Quote:
I don't like liars, especially not holier-than-thou ones.


Then you should consider a different line of posting, as I suggested. I mean, you DID post a fake WT cover... and article... yes? Oh, wait - maybe I should ask: just what do YOU consider to be a LIE?

Quote:
Don't argue law with an attorney, peabrain.


That's MRS. Peabrain to you, sir... and I'll be sure to keep that in mind... when I encounter an attorney. Although, I ain't a-scared o' them, either!

Quote:
WHACK!!


GOODNESS, man! You have GOT to open your eyes! Or get a guide-dog or sumthin'! But you REALLY should stop runnin' into them brick WALLS! Sooner or later, you're gonna go (more) whacky in the head, if you keep doing that! Here... here's an ice pack. Your right eye... you know, the one with that honkin' rafter in it... looks like it could use something cold on it. (SA winces as she places ice pak against dear Focus' very bruised cheek...)

Quote:
Focus
("Anti-Stupid" Class)


Yes, please... do. Focus. Well, best you can with that bruised eye. Else you lookin' to flunk THAT "class", my friend.

Peace! Just waitin' for you to receive it!

YOUR servant and a slave of Christ,

Shellamar


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5093
Dear 'Mom, girl... peace to you, thank you... and please don't let dear Focus (again, peace to YOU!) get to you. He don't know me... and many who initially engage with me here and elsewhere don't. I just shake me head, 'specially when they get all "knowing" about me... say I'm lyin'... and then later hafta go, "Oh, wait... but I didn't KNOW!"

I don't hold it against them, luv - you know that. I just shake my head at the evidence of their former association with the WTBTS: folks come out... and think that because they have they're all clean, now. Yet, one can STILL see the deepset "stains" of that association... on their "garments"... even decades later in some instances.

Only one thing I know of that removes that kind of "dirt." Blood. Wink.

Peace, luv!

YSSFS of Christ,

Shel


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 5:07 pm
Posts: 2461
AGuest wrote:
Dear 'Mom, girl... peace to you, thank you... and please don't let dear Focus (again, peace to YOU!) get to you. He don't know me... and many who initially engage with me here and elsewhere don't. I just shake me head, 'specially when they get all "knowing" about me... say I'm lyin'... and then later hafta go, "Oh, wait... but I didn't KNOW!"

I don't hold it against them, luv - you know that. I just shake my head at the evidence of their former association with the WTBTS: folks come out... and think that because they have they're all clean, now. Yet, one can STILL see the deepset "stains" of that association... on their "garments"... even decades later in some instances.

Only one thing I know of that removes that kind of "dirt." Blood. Wink.

Peace, luv!

YSSFS of Christ,

Shel



/:) 8)

And yes that " Blood" removes all unwanted tuff stains, LOL...but you just gotta wanna get rid of those stains. But if you don't see em...ooh well...

Peace and love my sister, Kim


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5093
Yeah, that can be the hard part, luv (peace!): admitting you got somethin' (besides caviar) all over your "best" silk "shirt." That sucks. LOLOLOL!

Peace, m'luv!

YSSFS of Christ,

Shellamar


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 12:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 3:33 am
Posts: 40
You are absolutely right. JW's leave the sect but
retain the mental attitudes of the Watchtower followers
and the WTBS
Namely:

(1) Thinking whatever they now believe is the only religion acceptable to God
(2) Other paths, other churches and other denominations are not "in the truth"
(3) Thinking only themselves and their group have the "right way" the "real thing"
(4) The need to "correct" others thinking and align them with their own ideas.
(5) The idea God is dealing with them exclusively and "speaking to them".
(6) Intolerance towards Catholics, Jews, Lutherans, Anglicans, etc etc or any
non-fundamentalist group of Christians. Viewing these as not legitimate, lesser than
and not acceptable to God.
(7) Thinking they have "special knowledge" SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE is the prime identifier
of the Cult Mentality, the idea you "know things" and understand God's will while others
do not. That is the ultimate mark of a Jehovah's Witness mentality.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group