| xjwsforChrist http://xjwsforchrist.com/ |
|
| Evil men. http://xjwsforchrist.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2161 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | John Foster [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Evil men. |
![]() See the evil grins on the mugs of some of these fraudsters and charlatans! Can you spot: Brother "Da Judge" Joe F. Rutherford & His Lover? They are both in the photo, I assure you. __ Focus ("Canuck" Class) |
|
| Author: | AGuest [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
Mr. Rutherford, down front with thin bowtie (peace, dear Focus). His lover... hmmmm... that would take me passing a judgment call, based on the outward appearance and (maybe) gossip ('cause I don't know that he had such a lover). I'll wait for you to reveal the one... and the substantiation (although, not sure I care about his sexual preferences... except in the light of his hypocrisy). Peace to you! Your servant and a slave of Christ, Shellamar |
|
| Author: | John Foster [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
AGuest wrote: not sure I care about his sexual preferences And who mentioned anything "sexual"? Are you projecting? Remember, the "WHACK!" is never lurking too far. Look again, and clear your mind of extraneous considerations. Focus, focus, focus on what was written, and not what you think was written. __ Focus ("Trouble" Class) |
|
| Author: | Watersprout [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
I thought 'lover' meant sexual? Who cares if he liked women, men or both! His hypocrisy is of more concern. |
|
| Author: | John Foster [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
Watersprout wrote: I thought 'lover' meant sexual? Unfortunately, you thought wrong. I am a lover of catnip as well as of carotid arteries. Neither love is sexual/ Quote: Who cares if he liked women, men or both! Your list is far from exhaustive. You are miaowing up the wrong tree, little one... Look carefully at the picture. The "kloo" is therein. __ Focus ("No shit 'agape'" Class) |
|
| Author: | AGuest [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
Speaking only for myself, I "went there" because there are two gentlemen arm in arm, dear Focus (peace to you!)... and I've reason to believe there were... have been... are... SEVERAL homosexual men in the WTBTS leadership. As is the case with MOST religions and particularly the more prominent ones. But you are right: I should not have assumed you meant sexually. In that light, I'm even more stumped. So, again, I'll wait for your revelation. Peace to you! A slave of Christ, Shellamar |
|
| Author: | John Foster [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
Look for what is ... __ Focus ("out of place?" Class) |
|
| Author: | OUTLAW [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 1:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
I`ve seen the pic before.. The guy on the right behind the judge.. Looks like somebodys mini-me.. He probably wrote Short Articles for the WBT$..LOL!!.. Considering the judge was a sociopath.. He probably only loved himself.. I`ll wait on Focus to reveal the answer.. ........................................... ...OUTLAW
|
|
| Author: | tec [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 2:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
Could you just clarify what you meant, John? Peace, your servant and a slave of Christ, tammy |
|
| Author: | s-Kally [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
Hey Foster, as i scroll down to my thread about the elder at my door SUNDAY morn, i see you have yet to feed back. please treat yourself to the fine witness we both gave!! lol check out all my latest postings doll...please, no thx is necessary for keeping you up to date. |
|
| Author: | John Foster [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
Thank you, all. But, no one is on the right tack - indeed, I wonder if everyone's sober here? To Prez Rutherford's right is Charles van Amburgh, long-time Treasurer/Secretary of the WTBTS, whose expertise was in false accounting, tax evasion and in committing perjury when giving evidence for the WTBTS in court in various ill-conceived actions or defenses. van Amburgh wrote a wonderful book, The Way To Paradise, in 1924 that was published by the WTBTS. Here's some of its wisdom (pages 34 & 8 respectively), showing that in addition to being a cheat and a liar, van Amburgh was an idiot: ![]() ![]() But indeed he was not our Rutherford's beloved... Every post of mine in this thread has provided an additional clue. This one contains several! Did I mention the photo was taken shortly after the criminal gang's (mistakenly early) release from prison, so in the very early 1920s? __ Focus ("Pay Attention to All the Flock in the Front Row" Class) |
|
| Author: | AGuest [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 7:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
Perhaps the problem is your overestimation of most here's concern as TO the WTBTS, dear Focus (peace to you!). While discussions ABOUT the WTBTS and its false teachings are welcome here, many have moved on from allowing them to be any kind of a REAL force... negative OR positive... in their lives. Hence, we no longer keep up with much of the WTBTS "trivia" out there. Because we KNOW their false, fake, lying, conning, cheating, thieving, imposters. We no longer have to read articles, current OR past, or secular commentary to know this. I am not taking issue with YOUR need to do so. It's just that we TRULY have a different AGENDA, which some can't quite seem to grasp. SOME folks, perhaps you, wish to expose the WTBTS merely as a secular scam using wordly wiles to trick folks into believing they're actually true prophets so that they can cheat and mislead folks out of their money, land, etc. And they ARE... and so more power TO you all for exposing that. OTHERS wish to expose them as a den of deprivated perverts who do nothing more than set up traps for children so as to lure THEM into abused... sexually and otherwise... or allow others to do so. And they ARE... and so more power TO such ones for exposing THAT. Yet, others of us see their leaders as the descendants and an extension of the corrupt priests, and hypocritical scribes and Pharisees who sat THEMSELVES in the seat of Moses, portending to be mediators between man and God... instead of Christ. And THAT is what we seek to expose... for those who are still VICTIMS of her fornication. Please, then, excuse us for not only not "knowing" who is who in your image... but actually not really CARING. Wait, I don't mean that as an insult/offense, truly. I am responding to your comment or surprise that we don't know... with an explanation as to WHY we (might not). It's just not important to US... as OUR agenda is not to YOU. So, you should feel free to just go on an tell us, because most probably NONE of us will be able to guess. Again, not being sarcastic, at ALL, truly. Just being truthful. Peace to you! YOUR servant and a slave of Christ, Shellamar |
|
| Author: | John Foster [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
You are still not picking up any of the clues. Enormously humungous hint: Who said the lover is a human? __ Focus ("Sheesh" Class) |
|
| Author: | ANOMOS [ Mon Aug 11, 2014 9:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Evil men. |
I can spot Mac Millan on the back row. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|