xjwsforChrist

Non-Religious Christian Spirituality
It is currently Tue Apr 21, 2026 5:29 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 12:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:12 pm
Posts: 34
(image removed - admin)


__
Focus
("Only One Rule" Class)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5133
And we've had THIS discussion already (peace to you!). She's not a JW, but only identifies with the religion. In which case, nothing they CAN do... until she is baptized. And apparently, she ain't stupid. Yet. Even so, none of us know what MAY come of this... anymore than we knew what was brewing behind the scenes with Michael Jackson.

Please, stop using this site to speculate in such a way? That's not what we're here for. If you want to take legitimate shots at the WTBTS and expose them on legitimate issues, by all means, do so. But please don't use this forum as a place to vent your personal issues with the Williams sisters (and perhaps their success and prosperity). They don't owe you, me... OR, at this time, the WTBTS... an explanation for ANY of their choices.

In addition, that THEY say they are associated with Jehovah's Witnesses doesn't mean the WTBTS agrees. That they haven't come out and renounced these girls, though, means... what? They don't come out and (more) publicly renounce those that ARE members... but they've disfellowshipped. It's all kept in house. We ALL know that.

Please find another cover to exploit here? In the meantime, I am going to ask that this one be taken down... as there is no benefit in having it posted here. Those who wish to see Ms. Williams in the buff will need to do so elsewhere... or buy the magazine. And you can go take a cold shower... and stop pretending that your purpose here was "honorable." I mean, really... PLETHORA of other ways to state your point. This surely was not the best one.

Peace to you!

A slave of Christ,

Shellamar


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:19 am
Posts: 3403
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1933


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5133
Thank you, dear tec (peace to you!). I hope new members have read the rule and guidelines... and understand that while they are MORE than welcome to use this site to expose the WTBTS, such must be done without malice and libel, and in decency. AND this is not as much a place for folks to push their anti-WTBTS agenda (although we're not opposed to that, at ALL), as it is a safe place for the Body.

In addition to Ms. Williams being entitled to be paid for views of her image, our members are entitled to NOT have to view material that could be offensive (in some form). Hopefully, everyone will remember that simply linking such images is sufficient so that those who WISH to view them may... but those who do not are not forced to.

Peace to you!

YSSFS of Christ,

Shel


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:12 pm
Posts: 34
Fine, I will link to the image to comply with silly requirements:
http://oi62.tinypic.com/3355dna.jpg
And all you hypocrites will click on it, lol.

Now on to my footstep follower, apparently seeking a racier alternative to her Christ: ;)

AGuest wrote:
Ms. Williams being entitled to be paid for views of her image

What a load of rubbish.

The image is the property of ESPN, who bought out her rights when she signed the model release.

I am entitled to make fair and limited use thereof, for purposes of criticism or comment, free from any requirements to make payment, under laws of both the USA, all West European states, Canada, Australia, N.Z. and most other places. It may not be legal in North Korea or a few other such spots but frankly, dear, I don't give a damn.

I'm not reproducing the magazine. I am lampooning its cover.

In summary - you are an ignoramus with a big mouth and firm opinions based on the nonsense that you consider to be your """thoughts""".

Additionally, I have caught you giving legal opinions in a number of threads. Latest, in xjwsforchrist.forumatic.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2169
Invariably and perhaps inevitably, your legal advice is wrong. As you furthermore are not a lawyer, or a licensed legal practitioner, are you aware you are committing criminal offences in a wide variety of jurisdictions?

I am.

So, shut up.

WHACK!
__
Focus
("Ignorance is not bliss for those exposed to it" Class)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 9:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:15 pm
Posts: 5133
Quote:
Fine, I will link to the image to comply with silly requirements:
http://oi62.tinypic.com/3355dna.jpg


Well, you certainly don't HAVE to sully YOUR very "clean" hands with the likes of US silly folk, dear Focus (peace to you!). There ARE other forums. Or... you could always start yer own...

Quote:
And all you hypocrites will click on it, lol.


I can assure you, not ALL of us will - LOLOLOL!

Quote:
Now on to my footstep follower, apparently seeking a racier alternative to her Christ: ;)


There is no racier alternative, luv. He's as fast as they come. Time knows no bounds...

Quote:
AGuest wrote:
Ms. Williams being entitled to be paid for views of her image


True.

Quote:
What a load of rubbish.


Not true.

Quote:
The image is the property of ESPN, who bought out her rights when she signed the model release.


Maybe. You don't know her contract. I don't think Ms. Williams is naive enough to have given up ALL of her royalty rights... and definitely not those that are NOT connected to ESPN. Even so, since ESPN probably has EXCLUSIVE license/rights... well, you know where I'm going with that... don'cha?

Quote:
I am entitled to make fair and limited use thereof, for purposes of criticism or comment, free from any requirements to make payment, under laws of both the USA, all West European states, Canada, Australia, N.Z. and most other places.


You are, luv... on your OWN or some other forum... perhaps. This one, though... not so much.[/quote]

Quote:
It may not be legal in North Korea or a few other such spots but frankly, dear, I don't give a damn.


To each his own... only, again, not necessarily here...

Quote:
I'm not reproducing the magazine. I am lampooning its cover.


Yeah, well... again... not HERE.

Quote:
In summary - you are an ignoramus with a big mouth and firm opinions based on the nonsense that you consider to be your """thoughts""".


Yes, but you still can't post such stuff HERE. See? Oh, wait, no... you don't. Because... it's not THERE. Because... me and my big mouth and firm opinions don't think it should BE here. And others agreed. SO... it's not. SEE?

Quote:
Additionally, I have caught you giving legal opinions in a number of threads. Latest, in xjwsforchrist.forumatic.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=2169


I can give legal opinions, luv, such that the information is available to any who only wishes to access it. I can not... and have not... held myself out as a lawyer (I am not a lawyer) or give(n) legal ADVICE (I don't really care what folks do, and any who knows me will TELL you... I TELL them to "get an attorney". Some folks more than once). Big'a dif'ronce...

Quote:
Invariably and perhaps inevitably, your legal advice is wrong.


Perhaps. But you still can't post that image of Ms. Williams HERE. And all of your insults and opinions won't change that. Capiche?

Quote:
As you furthermore are not a lawyer, or a licensed legal practitioner, are you aware you are committing criminal offences in a wide variety of jurisdictions?


I am not, but if you think I am... sue me. Just note, I've been accused before... and so I am WELL awar of what I can and can not post HERE, luv. But, I mean, if you're feeling froggy... g'head... leap..

Quote:
I am.


See above.

Quote:
So, shut up.


Ummmm... you've apparently mistaken this to be YOUR forum... and yourself a moderator. Wrong. As to both. So, taking your own advice might be appropro here.

Quote:
WHACK!


Oooh, I hope that didn't hurt. Next time, look where yer walkin'. 'Cause up in HERE, you might find yourself face first... into a brick wall.

Still, I bid you peace. I hope you're of the sort what can receive it.

YOUR servant and a slave of Christ,

Shellamar (who asked that this thread remain, so please do not be concerned, any who might be - we got this)...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 9:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 5:09 pm
Posts: 680
Ugly butt. :(

Please don't link again to such abominations.

I am a man of taste.
!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 10:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 6:12 pm
Posts: 34
ANOMOS wrote:
Ugly butt. :(
Please don't link again to such abominations.
I am a man of taste.
!

Her wealth makes up for her "butt", to many.

__
Focus
("Reality" Class)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 244 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group